Do We Need An iLight? - Yanko Design
I'chiliad going to start this post with an IMHO considering information technology'due south a cracking example of how simplicity in design means complication in role – which ironically is the opposite of what Apple stands for. Designer Miyoshimasato envisages the iLight, an Apple designed flashlight.
Footstep ane: Make it look like an Apple product. Put a check hither because it really does look like an Apple product. You've got the slim slick body devoid of any switches and buttons.
Footstep 2: Requite it an Apple tree logo and "i" meme. Put another bank check here considering this concept fulfills both prerequisites.
Step 3: Integrate current Apple technologies and so the user interface feels familiar. This deserves a big 'x' because adding a bear upon interface with multiple inputs does lilliputian to make the product ameliorate. In this instance, a single bear upon turns on the light. Tap it once more and the light turns off. To increment the luminance, moving picture your finger forward and conversely motion picture is backwards to decrease luminance. To prevent it from turning on accidentally, double tap to lock it. The glowing Apple logo indicates battery status and a unmarried tap on that turns on the emergency calorie-free flashes for 'Assistance' in morse lawmaking.
Step four: No user replaceable battery. It recharges via USB. Put a check here because that'southward something Apple tree would definitely do.
Needlessly complicated? Yous make up one's mind.
Designer: Miyoshimasato
Source: https://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/03/do-we-need-an-ilight/
0 Response to "Do We Need An iLight? - Yanko Design"
Post a Comment